Micro Behavioral Mechanisms Linking Geopolitical Risk and RMB Internationalization: Evidence from Belt and Road Countries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/1gsw6613Keywords:
Geopolitical Risk, RMB Internationalization, Risk Aversion, Psychological Account, Belt and Road Countries.Abstract
This article explores how geopolitical risks influence RMB internationalization based on a behavioral perspective introducing the theories of “limited attention” and “psychological account”. The research takes the monthly trade RMB settlement data of 15 countries along the “Belt and Road” from 2015 to 2023 as samples, and constructs a two-way fixed effects model. The research found that geopolitical risk plays a significantly positive role in promoting RMB use in the countries, indicating that against a backdrop of rising global political uncertainty, RMB has become an important choice for the countries to diversify their currency allocation. In addition, market risk aversion will restrict RMB use, but does not have a positive effect on the above relationship, reflecting the separation between political risk and market risk in the psychological account during the decision-making process. Furthermore, the heterogeneity analysis shows that countries with high trade dependence on China may turn to the traditional risk-aversion currency when the risk rises, while countries with low one may choose RMB as an alternative. This research integrates the behavioral finance and the currency internationalization theory, and provides policy implications for promoting RMB internationalization.
Downloads
References
[1] Huang R W. The geopolitical and economic impact of the Ukraine crisis on the Belt and Road Initiative. Contemporary International Relations, 2023, 1: 26-30
[2] Zhang F L, Yang Y P. New trends in de-dollarization: effectiveness and future. Contemporary International Relations, 2024, 10: 46-69, 134-135
[3] Cai X Y, Pan S, Li J, et al. Research progress, strategic opportunities, and policy reflections on RMB internationalization. China Money Market, 2025, 12: 42-48
[4] Kahneman D. Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1973,
[5] Shen Y T, Lu Q, Chen J. Research on irrational information behavior from a cognitive perspective: mental accounting theory and its application. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2024, 43(12): 1483-1494
[6] Tversky A, Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1992, 5: 297-323
[7] Caldara D, Iacoviello M. Measuring geopolitical risk. American Economic Review, 2022, 112(4): 1194-1225
[8] Zhong X S, Jiang K W, Feng C C, et al. Geopolitical risk and the anchor effect of RMB: an empirical analysis based on countries and regions along the "Belt and Road". Economic Problems, 2024, 1: 48-56
[9] Cboe. Cboe Volatility Index Mathematics Methodology. Available at: https://cdn.cboe.com/resources/indices/Cboe_Volatility_Index_Mathematics_Methodology.pdf, last accessed 2026/3/13,
[10] Wang X Y, Yang Y H. How does economic policy uncertainty affect stock price synchronicity? Based on the perspective of limited attention. Journal of Economics, 2021, 5: 99-113
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Highlights in Business, Economics and Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







