Research on Green Gross Domestic Product Accounting Based on a Comprehensive Evaluation Model

Authors

  • Haoyu Zhu Business School, Soochow University, Suzhou, China, 215006

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/g46xzn81

Keywords:

Green GDP, SEEA framework, Green Remedy Rate, Analytic Hierarchy Process, Sustainable development.

Abstract

Traditional gross domestic product ignores environmental and resource costs, making it difficult to reflect the sustainability of economic activities. This study constructs a green GDP accounting model based on the United Nations System of Environmental-Economic Accounting, integrating resource consumption, environmental degradation losses, and pollution control costs. It quantifies the economic impact on the environment through 12 indicators. Using a green restoration rate model and the analytic hierarchy process, it assesses the potential for global climate mitigation using rainfall, greenhouse gas emissions, sea level, and biodiversity as indicators. Weighted analysis shows that biodiversity and greenhouse gas emissions have the greatest impact. Based on data from 2015 to 2023, the study uses China as a case study to combine climate impact models and entropy analysis in examining the multidimensional impacts of green GDP, with results showing that the environmental dimension holds the highest weighting at 39.2% and a projected 4.3% reduction in fossil fuel consumption over the next five years.. The study validates the application value of green GDP in global and Chinese climate mitigation efforts, providing scientific basis for optimizing resource allocation and formulating environmental policies, thereby contributing to the achievement of sustainable development goals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Zhao Kefei, Fu Zexin, Lin Lijie. A Study on the Development Level of Green Buildings in Eastern Chinese Provinces Based on the DPSIR Model [J]. Construction Economics, 2024, 45(05): 93-99. DOI: 10.14181/j.cnki.1002-851x.202405093.

[2] Dong Xin. Foundations and Pathways for the Green Transformation of China's Real Estate Industry [J]. China Prices, 2024, (01): 53-56+71.

[3] Li Juan. A Study on the Impact of the Digital Economy on Regional Green Development [J]. Modern Business, 2023, (19): 44-47. DOI: 10.14097/j.cnki.5392/2023.19.038.

[4] Wang Hongbing, Liu Yijun, Song Dawei. Using the Think Tank Double Helix Method to Construct a Green GDP Evaluation System [J]. Chinese Academy of Sciences Bulletin, 2022, 37(06): 783-793. DOI: 10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.20220306001.

[5] Liu Xilin. Striving to Become Green Enterprises and Builders and Managers of Ecological Civilization [J]. Modern Enterprise, 2022, (04): 32-33.

[6] Editorial Department of this Journal. 2022 Two Sessions: High-Quality Development Bolsters China's Confidence [J]. Fiscal Supervision, 2022, (07): 5-12.

[7] Gao Sihan. The Technological Rivalry Between China and the United States in the 21st Century [J]. World Science, 2022, (03): 39-40.

[8] Wang Hongru. Where Does Consumer Demand Come From Under the Pandemic? [J]. Consultation Forum, 2022, (02): 32-34.

[9] Wang Kang, Zhou Jun. The Impact of Environmental Regulations, Energy Structure, and GDP on Industrial Investment: A Sectoral Perspective [J]. Research on Technology, Economy, and Management, 2021, (10): 113-118.

[10] Zhang Junfeng, Xu Wenjuan, Wang Yueqi, et al. Survey and Analysis of China's Carbon Emissions Status Toward Carbon Neutrality [J]. Huadian Technology, 2021, 43(10): 1-10.

Downloads

Published

06-11-2025

How to Cite

Zhu, H. (2025). Research on Green Gross Domestic Product Accounting Based on a Comprehensive Evaluation Model. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 64, 273-279. https://doi.org/10.54097/g46xzn81