The Impact of Emerging Digital Solutions on the Improvement of ESG Evaluations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/3drv6r36Keywords:
ESG Evaluations, Digital Solutions, blockchain, AI, big data.Abstract
With the growing emphasis on sustainable and green finance, ESG ratings have become more important for investors and regulators, yet their effectiveness remains a significant concern. This study systematically reviews some critical problems of ESG rating in sustainable investment, such as methodological divergences and consistency challenges among major rating agencies. On this basis, it further synthesizes current progress and practical exploration of digital technologies including blockchain, big data and artificial intelligence in improving transparency and disclosure efficiency for ESG assessments. Specifically, blockchain can enhance the traceability and authenticity of data, AI can improve the scoring consistency through better data processing, and big data can provide more information inputs and dynamic dimensions for evaluation. The conclusion calls for integrating these technologies to foster a more transparent and dynamic ESG rating ecosystem for better reliability, which requires supportive policy frameworks in area such as data governance and cross-sector collaboration to ensure effective implementation.
Downloads
References
[1] R. Gibson Brandon, P. Krueger, P. S. Schmidt, ESG rating disagreement and stock returns. Financ. Anal. J. 77, 104–127 (2021) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0015198X.2021.1963186
[2] F. Berg, J. F. Kölbel, R. Rigobon, Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG rating. Rev. Finance 26, 1315–1344 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfac033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfac033
[3] D. M. Christensen, G. Serafeim, A. Sikochi, Why is corporate virtue in the eye of the beholder? The case of ESG ratings. Account. Rev. 97, 147–175 (2022) https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2019-0506 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/TAR-2019-0506
[4] Q. Cheng, Y. Lou, M. Yang, ESG reporting divergence. HKU Bus. Sch. Pap. Ser. (2023) DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4565408
[5] J. Wang, S. Wang, M. Dong, H. Wang, ESG rating disagreement and stock returns: Evidence from China. Int. Rev. Financ. Anal. 91, 103043 (2024) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.103043
[6] A. Rejeb, K. Rejeb, S. Simske, H. Treiblmaier, S. Zailani, Blockchain for sustainable development: A systematic review. J. Clean. Prod. 379, 134712 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134712
[7] G. Gianfrate, M. Kievid, ESG and artificial intelligence in finance: State-of-the-art and research takeaways. Finance Res. Lett. 48, 102949 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102949 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102949
[8] Y. Wang, J. Han, X. Zhao, Data-driven ESG assessment for blockchain services. J. Clean. Prod. 367, 132984 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132984 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132984
[9] Q. Zhou, Q. Liu, Blockchain adoption and corporate sustainability performance. J. Bus. Res. 143, 456–468 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.015
[10] Y. Chen, Z. Hu, L. Fang, Artificial intelligence technology and corporate ESG performance. Technovation 122, 102619 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102619
[11] H. Liu, Y. Wang, Z. Yu, Big data capabilities, ESG performance and corporate value. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 180, 121705 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121705 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121705
[12] X. Liu, Y. Zhang, The role of digital technologies in corporate sustainability: A review and research agenda. J. Bus. Res. 160, 113763 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113763 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113763
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Highlights in Business, Economics and Management
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
