A Study on the Impact of ESG Disclosure Policies on Corporate Stock Returns Based on the Difference-in-Differences (DID) Method

Authors

  • Juanjuan Ma SKEMA Business School, Paris, 92156, France

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/jv7bew89

Keywords:

Stock Returns, Difference-in-Differences Method, Disclosure Policies, ecological environment governance, environmental transparency.

Abstract

Under the background of "dual carbon" goal and the deepening of ecological environment governance, implementation of "Measures for the Management of Enterprise Environmental Information Disclosure according to Law" (2022) requires key polluters to disclose environmental information and promotes the capital market to pay attention to the environmental behavior of enterprises. This study takes the A-share heavy polluters from 2019 to 2023 as the sample, sets 412 enterprises that had been included in the key polluters before the policy as the experimental group, and matches 824 non-key polluters as the control group. Results show that after the implementation of the policy, the abnormal return rate of the experimental group is significantly higher than that of the control group (coefficient is 0.003, p<0.01), and the effect is more prominent in the enterprises with high quality of environmental information disclosure. Event study further showed that the cumulative abnormal return of the experimental group within the policy announcement window was 1.2% (p<0.05). Conclusion shows that the environmental information disclosure policy reduces information asymmetry by enhancing corporate environmental transparency, effectively improves the market evaluation of heavy polluting enterprises, verifies the capital market incentive effect of the policy, and provides empirical evidence for the synergy between environmental regulation and corporate environmental responsibility.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] GSIA. Global Sustainable Investment Review. November 2022; August 1, 2025 https://www.gsi-alliance.org/reports/global-sustainable-investment-review-2022/.

[2] Securities Association of China ESG Fund Development Report Annual Report of the Securities Association of China December 2023 August 1, 2025 http://www.sac.net.cn/hyfw/hydt/202308/t20230825_183213.html.

[3] MSCI. ESG Ratings Methodology for A Shares. MSCI ESG Rating Methodology Report. September 2023 August 1, 2025 https://www.msci.com/documents/10199-74604d0d3b3a4e3e8b9d1c8e3e3e3e3e.pdf.

[4] G. Friede, T. Busch, & A. Bassen, ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journ. Finan. Econom. 118 (3), 627 - 650 (2015).

[5] O. Lopez-de-Foronda, et al. ESG and stock returns: A meta-analysis. Journ. Bank. & Finan. 144, 106537 (2022).

[6] Z. Liu, et al. Greenwashing and ESG rating validity: Evidence from China. Journ. Corpor. Finan. 78, 102403 (2023).

[7] Q.Y. Li, H.Y. Wang, ESG performance, risk compensation and stock returns: Evidence from China's a-share market. China Indust. Econo. 6, 156 - 174 (2021).

[8] S. Shanaev, & B. Ghimire, ESG rating changes and stock returns: Evidence from US firms. Journ. Financ. Quantit. Analy. 57 (3), 1127 - 1158 (2022).

[9] J.D. Angrist, & J.S. Pischke, mostly harmless econometrics. Princeton University Press. (Princeton, NJ; Release date: January 2008).

[10] Business paths blend with greenery. White Paper on ESG Ratings of A-Shares. July 2022 August 1, 2024 https://www.syntaogreen.com/reports/2022-esg-rating-white-paper/.

Downloads

Published

06-11-2025

How to Cite

Ma, J. (2025). A Study on the Impact of ESG Disclosure Policies on Corporate Stock Returns Based on the Difference-in-Differences (DID) Method. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 64, 130-136. https://doi.org/10.54097/jv7bew89